Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 TMI Notes - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • Benami Property
  • Bill
  • Central Excise
  • Companies Law
  • Customs
  • DGFT
  • FEMA
  • GST
  • GST - States
  • IBC
  • Income Tax
  • Indian Laws
  • Money Laundering
  • SEBI
  • SEZ
  • Service Tax
  • VAT / Sales Tax
Types:
---- All Types ----
  • ---- All Types ----
  • Act Rules
  • Case Laws
  • Circulars
  • Manuals
  • News
  • Notifications
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
    Determination of tax liability which no tax is payable under the provisions of the Act : Clause 190 ...
    Definition for the operation of the General Anti-Avoidance Rule (GAAR) : Clause 184 of Income Tax Bi...
    Legislative tool curbing aggressive tax planning and abusive tax avoidance Scheme : Clause 183 of th...
    Procedural Safeguards and the Scope of GAAR : Clause 183 of Income Tax Bill, 2025 Vs. Section 100 of...
    Curbing aggressive tax avoidance strategies : Clause 182 of the Income Tax Bill, 2025 Vs. Section 99...
    Continuation and refinement of the General Anti-Avoidance Rule : Clause 181 of the Income Tax Bill, ...
    Statutory backbone of India's General Anti-Avoidance Rule (GAAR) : 180 of the Income Tax Bill, 2025 ...
    "Curbing aggressive tax avoidance strategies" under the General Anti-Avoidance Rule (GAAR) : Clause ...
    Countering the tax avoidance through codification of the General Anti-Avoidance Rule (GAAR) : Clause...
    limitation on Debt interest deduction as expenses in cross-border transactions : Clause 177 of Incom...
    Comprehensive framework for dealing with transactions with any notified jurisdictional areas : Claus...
    Anti-Avoidance Provisions in Securities Transactions : Clause 175 of the Income Tax Bill, 2025 Vs. S...
    Designed provisions to counteract tax avoidance schemes involving cross-border transactions : Clause...
    Important Definition within the framework of transfer pricing and anti-avoidance measures : Clause 1...
    Statutory Reporting & Penalties for persons entering into international and specified domestic trans...
    Revamped framework of the Transfer Pricing documentation & Penalties : Clause 171 of the Income Tax ...
    Harmonizing India's Secondary Adjustment Regime in Transfer Pricing : Clause 170 of the Income Tax B...
    Streamlining APA Implementation and Transfer Pricing Compliance : Clause 169 of Income Tax Bill, 202...
    Enhancing Certainty and Compliance in Transfer Pricing through Advance Pricing Agreements : Clause 1...
    Special provisions concerning the avoidance of tax, specifically empowering to Board to make "safe h...
❯❯
MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder

No Folders have been created

    +

    Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

    NOTE:

    Notes
    Showing Results for :
    Reset Filters
    Results Found:
    Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
    Act RulesBills
    Show AI Summary
    Determination of tax where exempt income is included: deduction at the average tax rate neutralises tax on non chargeable income.
    Clause 190 provides that where total income includes income on which no income-tax is payable, the assessee is entitled to a deduction from the tax chargeable equal to the tax computed at the average rate of income-tax on that non-taxable amount; the average rate is derived by dividing total tax by total income and applying that rate to the exempt portion to neutralise any tax attributable to non-chargeable income.
    Act RulesBills
    Show AI Summary
    General Anti Avoidance Rule expansion: new accommodating party concept widens GAAR reach and tightens tax planning scrutiny.
    Clause 184 of the Income Tax Bill, 2025 largely carries forward Section 102's wide definitions for GAAR-covering arrangement, asset, benefit, connected person, fund, party, step, and tax benefit-while introducing an accommodating party concept to capture third party facilitators, updating cross references and terminology (e.g., "tax year"), and explicitly including permanent establishments and treaty arrangements to strengthen anti avoidance coverage.
    Act RulesBills
    Show AI Summary
    General Anti-Avoidance Rule expanded to permit concurrent or substitutive application, increasing substance-over-form scrutiny.
    Clause 183 expands the statutory reach of the General Anti-Avoidance Rule (GAAR) by expressly permitting GAAR to apply "in addition to, or in lieu of" any other basis for determination of tax liability, while maintaining application "as per such guidelines and subject to such conditions, as prescribed." The clause enables authorities to apply a substance-over-form approach, allowing concurrent or exclusive use of GAAR alongside specific anti-avoidance or substantive provisions, and thereby alters the relationship between GAAR and SAARs previously left ambiguous under Section 101.
    Act RulesBills
    Show AI Summary
    General Anti Avoidance Rule: clause makes GAAR an overriding tool but conditions its use on prescribed procedural guidelines.
    Clause 183 preserves GAAR's authority to apply "in addition to, or in lieu of" other bases for tax determination, enabling recharacterisation of arrangements based on substantive economic realities. It uniquely conditions GAAR's exercise on "guidelines and...conditions, as prescribed," thereby mandating subordinate guidance to define thresholds, approval processes, taxpayer rights, documentation and timelines, with the intent of reducing arbitrariness and enhancing predictability compared with the earlier framework.
    Act RulesBills
    Show AI Summary
    General Anti-Avoidance Rule: Treat connected and accommodating parties as one, enabling look-through of corporate structures.
    Clause 182 authorises treating connected persons as one, disregarding an accommodating party, treating an accommodating party and another party as the same person, and looking through corporate structures to determine whether a tax benefit exists, thereby enabling recharacterisation of arrangements that lack commercial substance and are designed to secure tax advantages.
    Act RulesBills
    Show AI Summary
    General Anti Avoidance Rule: broad authority to recharacterise and deny tax benefits where arrangements lack commercial substance.
    Clause 181 empowers tax authorities to neutralise tax benefits from arrangements lacking commercial substance by denying benefits (including treaty benefits) and imposing a range of consequences: disregarding or recharacterising steps or whole arrangements; treating arrangements as not entered into; treating accommodating or connected parties as one; reallocating tax attributes; recharacterising residence or situs; and looking through corporate structures. Clause 181(3) authorises reclassification of equity/debt and capital/revenue character. Rule 10UA limits consequences to the impermissible part of an arrangement, providing proportionality.
    Act RulesBills
    Show AI Summary
    Commercial substance test: disregard arrangements whose economic effect differs from form, focusing on round-trips and artificial parties.
    An arrangement may be disregarded for tax purposes if it lacks commercial substance, determined by whether the overall economic effect differs materially from its formal steps; key indicators include round-trip financing, an accommodating party, offsetting elements, disguised transactions, relocations made for tax benefit, and arrangements that do not materially affect business risks or cash flows independent of tax. Certain factors-duration, taxes paid, or an exit route-are not alone sufficient to establish substance, and the Bill omits a prior explicit definition of accommodating party, potentially creating interpretive uncertainty.
    Act RulesBills
    Show AI Summary
    GAAR main purpose test targets arrangements primarily motivated by tax benefit, with procedural safeguards for invocation.
    Clause 179 defines an impermissible avoidance arrangement under GAAR as one whose main purpose is obtaining a tax benefit and which meets at least one of four tainting conditions: arm's length departure, misuse or abuse of law, lack of commercial substance, or non bona fide means; it creates a rebuttable presumption placing the burden on the taxpayer for impugned steps and is operationalized through Rule 10UB's pre reference notice, Commissioner review, and Approving Panel safeguards.
    Act RulesBills
    Show AI Summary
    General Anti-Avoidance Rule: empowers authorities to disregard abusive arrangements and recharacterise tax consequences subject to safeguards.
    Clause 178 codifies GAAR with an overriding non-obstante effect, enabling authorities to declare an arrangement an "impermissible avoidance arrangement" and determine tax consequences, applying to whole arrangements or any step or part, based on tests of commercial substance and main purpose, while procedural safeguards-notice, hearing, and an approving panel-are prescribed to temper broad remedial powers.
    Act RulesBills
    Show AI Summary
    Interest deduction limitation restricts deductible interest to a fixed EBITDA ratio with carryforward relief and specified carve-outs.
    Limitation on deductible interest in cross border related party financing restricts interest deductions where interest paid or payable by Indian entities to non resident associated enterprises is treated as excess interest, capped by a fixed ratio of the borrower's EBITDA and by interest payable to associated enterprises; disallowed amounts are carry forwardable subject to the same ratio, a deeming rule treats economically supported third party loans as associated enterprise debt, and specified carve outs apply to regulated financial entities and bona fide IFSC Finance Companies under operational rules.
    Act RulesBills
    Show AI Summary
    Transactions with non-cooperative jurisdictions: treated as international transactions, triggering transfer pricing scrutiny and denial of deductions.
    Clause 176 creates a regime for transactions with persons in notified jurisdictional areas: government notification power; deeming parties as associated enterprises and transactions as international transactions for transfer pricing; disallowance of deductions absent prescribed authorisation and documentation; deeming unexplained receipts as assessable income; and mandatory higher withholding on payments to NJA persons, with broad definitions and anticipated procedural rules similar to Rule 21AC.
    Act RulesBills
    Show AI Summary
    Anti-avoidance in securities transactions deems income to the economic owner to prevent dividend and bonus stripping abuse.
    Clause 175 establishes a deeming regime that treats dividends and interest received by an interposed holder as the income of the original economic owner where securities are transferred and subsequently reacquired, limits taxpayer liability where similar securities are acquired, apportions income for partial-year beneficial interest holders, provides exceptions if the taxpayer proves absence of avoidance, disallows losses from dividend and bonus stripping within prescribed acquisition and disposal windows, and treats disallowed bonus-related losses as cost adjustments for retained units.
    Act RulesBills
    Show AI Summary
    Deeming of income transferred to non-residents prevents tax avoidance by treating economic beneficiaries as taxable residents.
    Clause 174 applies where a transfer of assets, before or after commencement, results in income payable to a non-resident, and where the transfer alone or with associated operations confers on any person rights that give the power to enjoy that income. Such income is deemed to be that person's income for all purposes; related capital sums are treated to prevent disguise as non-taxable receipts. Exceptions exist for bona fide commercial transactions, with the taxpayer bearing the burden to satisfy the assessing authority.
    Act RulesBills
    Show AI Summary
    Arm's length price principle reaffirmed and clarified in revised transfer pricing definitions, with expanded enterprise and transaction scope.
    Clause 173 of the Income Tax Bill, 2025 restates and refines transfer pricing definitions: arm's length price as the benchmark between independent parties in uncontrolled conditions; an expansive definition of "enterprise" covering goods, IP, services, contracts, investments and securities (directly or via units/subsidiaries); "permanent establishment" as a fixed place of business; and "transaction" to include informal or non enforceable arrangements. The clause updates the "specified date" cross reference to the Bill's return filing provision and adopts more itemised drafting while maintaining substantive continuity with Section 92F.
    Act RulesBills
    Show AI Summary
    Accountant's report requirement: certified transfer pricing reporting mandated for international and specified domestic transactions, with prescribed form and timing.
    Clause 172 requires every person entering into an international or specified domestic transaction in a tax year to obtain and furnish, by the specified date, a report from an accountant in the prescribed form, signed and verified as prescribed, setting forth such particulars as may be prescribed; the clause makes the obligation statutory, preserves applicability across taxpayer categories, and defers procedural form, verification and timing details to subordinate legislation while maintaining continuity with the existing reporting mechanics.
    Act RulesBills
    Show AI Summary
    Transfer pricing documentation: contemporaneous records required and rapid furnishing on demand to enhance transparency and enforcement.
    Clause 171 mandates maintenance and furnishing of prescribed transfer pricing documentation by persons entering into international or specified domestic transactions and by constituent entities of international groups, while delegating the specific content, retention periods, thresholds and filing procedures to rules. It enshrines a ten day furnishing requirement with possible extension, cross references definitions to the Bill's reporting provisions, and anticipates master file, local file and country by country reporting formats, thereby consolidating and modernising existing documentary obligations.
    Act RulesBills
    Show AI Summary
    Secondary adjustment: statutory deemed advance and repatriation rule with alternative option to pay additional tax in lieu of interest.
    Clause 170 mandates secondary adjustment where a primary transfer pricing adjustment of a prescribed monetary threshold increases income or reduces loss and excess money is not repatriated within the prescribed time; unrepatriated excess is deemed an advance to any non-resident associated enterprise and attracts notional interest computed as prescribed, with an alternative statutory option to pay an additional income-tax that is final and bars further credit or deduction.
    Act RulesBills
    Show AI Summary
    Advance Pricing Agreement application: modified returns must align tax assessments with agreed transfer pricing terms and timelines.
    The statutory mechanism requires taxpayers to furnish a modified return limited to APA-impacted items within a prescribed post-agreement period, treats that filing as a return for assessment purposes, and directs assessing officers to modify completed assessments or complete pending proceedings in accordance with the APA; designated limitation and deeming provisions clarify timelines and the status of proceedings to ensure retrospective yet circumscribed implementation of the APA.
    Act RulesBills
    Show AI Summary
    Advance pricing agreements secure pre determination of arm's length pricing to enhance transfer pricing certainty and reduce disputes.
    Clause 168 preserves the APA framework by empowering the Board, with Central Government approval, to determine the arm's length price or manner of attributing income to India for international transactions; to specify statutory and rule based methods (with adjustments); to make APAs prevail over general transfer pricing provisions; to bind both taxpayers and tax authorities for covered transactions; to permit rollback for prior years; and to declare APAs void ab initio for fraud or misrepresentation, with corresponding limitation period consequences and scheme making authority for procedural rules.
    Act RulesBills
    Show AI Summary
    Safe harbour rules mandate acceptance of declared transfer prices and deemed income, delivering taxpayer certainty while limiting administrative discretion.
    Clause 167 empowers the Board to prescribe safe harbour rules under which income-tax authorities shall accept the transfer price or deemed income declared by the assessee for transactions falling within section 9(2) and arm's length price provisions, creating a statutory presumption that reduces administrative discretion and dependency on detailed rule-making to specify eligibility, thresholds, documentation, and procedural requirements.

    TMI Notes

    Back

    All TMI Notes

    Showing Results for :
    Reset Filters
      No Records Found

      TMI Notes

      Back

      All TMI Notes

      whatsappJoin Channel
      Showing Results for : Reset Filters

      Comprehensive Legal Analysis of Jurisdictional Challenges and SEBI's Regulatory Framework in Securities Litigation

      25 January, 2024

      Contents
      Acts
      Rules & Regulations
      Plus +
      Summary
      Note

      Note

      -

      Bookmark

      Print

      Print

      Deciphering Legal Judgments: A Comprehensive Analysis of Case Law

      Reported as:

      2023 (12) TMI 915 - DELHI HIGH COURT

      Introduction: The legal landscape of securities regulation in India, particularly under the ambit of the Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI), presents a unique confluence of jurisdictional challenges and regulatory complexities. This commentary meticulously analyzes the multifaceted legal issues arising from a recent case involving territorial jurisdiction and the application of the doctrine of forum non-conveniens, intertwined with the procedural and substantive aspects of SEBI’s regulatory and enforcement mechanisms.

      I. Territorial Jurisdiction and Forum Non-Conveniens: An In-Depth Legal Examination

      The heart of the dispute lies in the preliminary objections raised concerning the territorial jurisdiction of the High Court in SEBI-related litigation. These objections bring forth the nuanced interpretation of territorial jurisdiction, particularly in the context of corporate and securities law. The argument pivots on the extent to which the High Court can exercise jurisdiction over matters involving statutory bodies like SEBI and corporate entities, especially when actions and decisions central to the dispute have occurred outside the court's territorial limits.

      The concept of forum non-conveniens, which addresses the appropriateness of a forum for adjudicating a dispute, is also critical. This doctrine is pivotal in deciding whether the litigation should proceed in the jurisdiction where it was filed or be relocated to a more suitable jurisdiction, considering factors such as the convenience of parties, location of evidence, and interests of justice.

      II. SEBI’s Settlement Process and Revocation of Settlement Orders

      The procedural journey and substantive analysis of SEBI's regulatory framework, particularly the settlement mechanism under the SEBI (Settlement Proceedings) Regulation 2018, are crucial. This mechanism allows for the resolution of disputes through settlement rather than litigation, providing an efficient alternative to lengthy court procedures. However, the revocation of such settlements, as observed in this case, raises important questions about the boundaries of regulatory discretion and the criteria for compliance. The legal implications of such revocations are significant, impacting not only the parties involved but also the broader landscape of securities regulation and corporate governance.

      III. The Role of High Courts in SEBI Matters

      The jurisdictional reach of High Courts in India, especially in matters involving SEBI, is a subject of intricate legal analysis. The interpretation of the High Court's powers under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, particularly in the post-amendment era, is essential. The cause of action as a basis for jurisdiction, its interaction with the doctrine of forum conveniens, and the subsequent determination of the most suitable venue for securities law litigation are critical aspects of this discussion.

      IV. Implications for Corporate Governance and Securities Regulation

      This case also has broader implications for corporate governance and securities regulation. The issues related to non-compliance with SEBI's norms and the resulting legal battles underscore the importance of adhering to regulatory requirements. The case highlights the need for robust governance structures within corporations and the critical role of regulatory bodies like SEBI in maintaining market integrity and protecting investor interests.

      V. Conclusion

      In conclusion, this case presents an intricate tapestry of legal issues, encompassing jurisdictional debates, regulatory mechanisms, and their impact on corporate governance. The detailed analysis of each aspect provides valuable insights into the complexities of securities law litigation in India. It underscores the critical role of judicial and regulatory bodies in upholding legal and ethical standards in the corporate sector, ensuring fair practices, and maintaining the integrity of financial markets. The commentary illustrates the interplay between jurisdictional challenges and regulatory compliance, offering a thorough understanding of the legal framework governing securities regulation in India.

       


      Full Text:

      2023 (12) TMI 915 - DELHI HIGH COURT

      Topics

      ActsIncome Tax