Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 TMI Notes - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • Benami Property
  • Bill
  • Central Excise
  • Companies Law
  • Customs
  • DGFT
  • FEMA
  • GST
  • GST - States
  • IBC
  • Income Tax
  • Indian Laws
  • Money Laundering
  • SEBI
  • SEZ
  • Service Tax
  • VAT / Sales Tax
Types:
---- All Types ----
  • ---- All Types ----
  • Act Rules
  • Case Laws
  • Circulars
  • Manuals
  • News
  • Notifications
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
    Act RulesIncome Tax
    Comparison of section 324 "Charge of tax in case of a firm." between the Income-Tax Act, 2025 (as pa...
    Act RulesIncome Tax
    Comparison of section 323 "Liability of directors of private company." between the Income-Tax Act, 2...
    Act RulesIncome Tax
    Comparison of section 311 "Charge of tax where shares of members in association of persons or body o...
    Act RulesIncome Tax
    Comparison of section 308 "Charge of tax in case of oral trust." between the Income-Tax Act, 2025 (a...
    Act RulesIncome Tax
    Comparison of section 307 "Charge of tax where share of beneficiaries unknown." between the Income-T...
    Act RulesIncome Tax
    Comparison of section 305 "Right of representative assessee to recover tax paid." between the Income...
    Act RulesIncome Tax
    Comparison of section 304 "Liability of representative assessee." between the Income-Tax Act, 2025 (...
    Act RulesIncome Tax
    Comparison of section 301 "Interpretation." between the Income-Tax Act, 2025 (as passed) and the Inc...
    Act RulesIncome Tax
    Comparison of section 298 "Levy of interest and penalty in certain cases." between the Income-Tax Ac...
    Act RulesIncome Tax
    Comparison of section 296 "Time-limit for completion of block assessment." between the Income-Tax Ac...
    Act RulesIncome Tax
    Comparison of section 295 "Undisclosed income of any other person." between the Income-Tax Act, 2025...
    Act RulesIncome Tax
    Comparison of section 294 "Procedure for block assessment." between the Income-Tax Act, 2025 (as pas...
    Act RulesIncome Tax
    Comparison of section 293 "Computation of total undisclosed income of block period." between the Inc...
    Act RulesIncome Tax
    Comparison of section 292 "Assessment of total undisclosed income as a result of search." between th...
    Act RulesIncome Tax
    Comparison of section 291 "Intimation of loss." between the Income-Tax Act, 2025 (as passed) and the...
    Act RulesIncome Tax
    Comparison of section 288 "Other amendments" between the Income-Tax Act, 2025 (as passed) and the In...
    Act RulesIncome Tax
    Comparison of section 287 "Rectification of mistake." between the Income-Tax Act, 2025 (as passed) a...
    Act RulesIncome Tax
    Comparison of section 286 "Time limit for completion of assessment, reassessment and recomputation" ...
    Act RulesIncome Tax
    Comparison of section 285 "Other provisions." between the Income-Tax Act, 2025 (as passed) and the I...
    Act RulesIncome Tax
    Comparison of section 283 "Provision for cases where assessment is in pursuance of an order on appea...
❯❯
MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder

No Folders have been created

    +

    Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

    NOTE:

    Notes
    Showing Results for :
    Reset Filters
    Results Found:
    Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
    Act RulesIncome Tax
    Show AI Summary
    Charge of tax on firms: statutory source choice alters which central enactment prescribes the applicable rate for a year.
    Both texts charge tax on a firm's total income but differ in the statutory source for the applicable rate: the Bill points to the annual tax statute as the operative source, while the Act uses a broader reference to any Central Act for the relevant year, potentially expanding the range of enactments that may prescribe the rate and introducing additional interpretive and administrative considerations.
    Act RulesIncome Tax
    Show AI Summary
    Director liability: personal joint and several responsibility for unrecoverable company tax, unless director disproves gross neglect or misfeasance.
    Section 323 imposes joint and several liability on persons who were directors of a private company during the relevant tax year where tax due (including penalty, interest and fees) cannot be recovered, operating irrespective of the Companies Act, 2013. A director is exempt only if he proves the non-recovery cannot be attributed to gross neglect, misfeasance or breach of duty. The Act omits a narrow conversion-to-public-company saving that appeared in the original Bill, thereby broadening potential director exposure.
    Act RulesIncome Tax
    Show AI Summary
    Taxation of AOPs/BOIs: unknown member shares trigger top personal rates on aggregate income; known shares require apportioned taxation.
    Where members' shares in an AOP/BOI are indeterminate or unknown, the entity's total income is taxed at the maximum marginal rate or at any higher rate applicable to a member's total income; where shares are determinate, each member's other income is tested against the Finance Act's non taxable threshold and portions attributable to higher rate members are taxed at those rates while the balance is taxed at the maximum marginal rate, with a deeming rule treating indeterminacy at formation or thereafter as sufficient.
    Act RulesIncome Tax
    Show AI Summary
    Oral trust taxation: trustee receipts are taxed at the maximum marginal rate, shifting compliance and liability to trustees.
    Tax on income connected to an oral trust is charged at the maximum marginal rate when a trustee receives or is entitled to receive income on behalf of or for the benefit of any person under an oral trust (per section 303(3)), irrespective of other provisions; the Bill had instead charged the income of the person appointed under an oral trust.
    Act RulesIncome Tax
    Show AI Summary
    Tax on unallocated trust income risks top marginal taxation unless beneficiaries and shares are expressly stated and ascertainable.
    Representative assesses holding income for beneficiaries with unspecified or indeterminate shares are taxable at the maximum marginal rate unless a court order, trust instrument or wakf deed expressly identifies beneficiaries and their ascertainable shares on the relevant date; limited exceptions allow taxation at association of persons rates where beneficiaries lack other significant income, where the trust is a sole testamentary trust, where a bona fide historical non testamentary trust for dependants exists, or for bona fide employee benefit funds, and business profits are normally subject to the top rate unless the narrow will trust exception applies.
    Act RulesIncome Tax
    Show AI Summary
    Representative assessee recovery rights secure retention via Assessing Officer certificate limiting recoverability at final settlement.
    A representative assessee who pays any sum under the Act may recover it from the principal or retain an equivalent amount in his representative capacity; a person who apprehends such assessment may retain estimated liability from monies payable to the principal; on dispute the Assessing Officer may issue a certificate authorising retention pending final settlement; recoverability is capped by the certificate amount, except where the representative holds additional assets of the principal, and the enacted text ties that cap to the time of final settlement.
    Act RulesIncome Tax
    Show AI Summary
    Representative assessee liability: treated as beneficial owner for assessment, with revenue able to reach beneficiaries directly.
    Section 304 treats a representative assessee as if the income were beneficially his for duties, liabilities and assessment; it places assessment liability on the representative in his own name, contains an exclusivity rule preventing assessment of the same income under other provisions, preserves the Assessing Officer's power to assess or recover tax directly from the beneficial owner, prescribes a pro rata formula for beneficiaries' share of a chargeable trust income, and grants the revenue equivalent remedies against property under the representative's control.
    Act RulesIncome Tax
    Show AI Summary
    Block period definition governs temporal scope for assessing undisclosed income, including virtual digital assets and documents.
    Clause 301 defines the block period as the six tax years preceding the tax year of a search or requisition plus the portion of that tax year to the date of the last authorisation, and deems the last authorisation executed on the conclusion recorded in the last panchnama for searches or on actual receipt for requisitions. It defines undisclosed income in two limbs: tangible and intangible items or entries representing undisclosed income (including virtual digital assets), and expenses/exemptions/deductions/allowances claimed under the Act that are found incorrect, and it lists books, documents and valuables as requisitioned or seized items.
    Act RulesIncome Tax
    Show AI Summary
    Levy of interest and penalty in search cases: interest accrues and an administrative penalty may attach to undisclosed income when returns are not furnished.
    Where a return required by a search notice is not filed, the provision charges interest on tax determined in the search assessment for the period from the day after the notice deadline until assessment completion, and permits an administrative penalty measured by reference to the tax leviable on undisclosed income determined in that assessment. A conditional bar prevents penalty for the block period if the return is filed, tax is paid with evidence, and no appeal is filed against the returned portion; any undisclosed income in excess of declared amounts remains penalizable. Procedural safeguards include a hearing, higher level approval for large penalties, and specified limitation and exclusion rules.
    Act RulesIncome Tax
    Show AI Summary
    Time-limit for completion of block assessment: statutory period anchored to quarter-end with specified exclusions and minimum remaining period.
    Time-limit for completion of block assessment fixes a statutory period for passing orders under the special search/block assessment procedure, anchors computation to a calendar endpoint, prescribes enumerated excluded periods (including custody of seized items, court stays, information exchange references, audit and valuation processes, references to valuation or appellate authorities, penalty and avoidance arrangement references, and Advance Rulings proceedings), provides a minimum remaining period protection after exclusions, and includes month end rounding; the enacted text shifts the anchor from month end to quarter end and refines exclusion wording and cross references.
    Act RulesIncome Tax
    Show AI Summary
    Undisclosed income transfer to other person's AO triggers block assessment and fixes abatement reference to receipt date.
    When an Assessing Officer is satisfied that seized money, assets, books, documents or any information therein pertain to a person other than the person searched, those materials must be handed to the Assessing Officer having jurisdiction over that other person, who shall proceed under section 294 and apply the block assessment provisions; for abatement under section 292 the reference date for the other person is the date the receiving AO obtains the seized materials or information.
    Act RulesIncome Tax
    Show AI Summary
    Block assessment procedure: time limited compelled return after search, limits revision rights and prescribes applicable procedural and penalty provisions.
    Section 294 compels a time limited special return of undisclosed income following a search or requisition, treats that return as within a specified return regime, precludes revised returns, prescribes which procedural and penalty provisions shall apply or be excluded, and requires prior approval by senior officers before issuing the notice.
    Act RulesIncome Tax
    Show AI Summary
    Total undisclosed income: rules for block-period computation, exclusions for short-period transfer-pricing transactions and loss restrictions.
    Computation of the total undisclosed income of the block period aggregates undisclosed income declared under the statutory declaration mechanism and undisclosed income determined by the Assessing Officer from seized material, survey or requisition results, and other material coming to the AO's notice; it prescribes temporal windows for book-based computation, excludes certain international and specified domestic transactions in the short inter-authorisation period from block computation to be assessed separately, and restricts set-off of brought-forward losses and unabsorbed depreciation against undisclosed block income while allowing carry-forward post-block period.
    Act RulesIncome Tax
    Show AI Summary
    Block assessment procedure centralises search-related assessments, abating parallel year-wise proceedings where initiated and enabling revival on annulment.
    Assessing Officers must assess or reassess the total undisclosed income of the block period under the Part, with those proceedings taking priority over ordinary year wise assessments; pending assessments for years in the block period abate (and may be deemed to have abated on the date certain notices were issued), non undisclosed income of the year of last authorisation is assessed separately, multiple searches are sequenced with timing extensions where needed, and abated proceedings may be revived if Part proceedings or specified orders are annulled.
    Act RulesIncome Tax
    Show AI Summary
    Intimation of loss: mandatory written notification to assessee when loss is established and eligible for carry forward and set-off.
    Section 291 requires the Assessing Officer to notify the assessee by an order in writing the amount of loss as computed by him when (a) a loss is established in assessment and (b) the assessee is entitled to carry forward and set off that loss for the purposes of the listed statutory provisions. The duty is mandatory and procedural, linking the notification obligation to both the establishment of loss in assessment and the assessee's statutory entitlement to carry forward and set-off.
    Act RulesIncome Tax
    Show AI Summary
    Recomputation of assessments tied to triggering events allows targeted amendments within specified limitation periods.
    Clause 288 permits an Assessing Officer to amend or recompute completed assessments in a limited set of scenarios triggered by downstream events-such as reassessment or recomputation orders, valuation or compensation revisions, patent revocation, settlement of foreign tax disputes, or validated transfer pricing determinations-with timelines generally governed by a four year limitation reckoned from the end of the relevant financial year or specified event, and subject to procedural safeguards and cross references to amendment and limitation provisions.
    Act RulesIncome Tax
    Show AI Summary
    Rectification of mistake: tax authorities may amend orders and intimations, with notice and hearing before raising liability.
    Section 287 authorises specified income tax authorities to amend orders and intimations to rectify mistakes apparent from the record, excluding matters considered and decided in appeal or revision. Amendments that increase liability require notice of intention and a reasonable opportunity of being heard; reductions in liability require refund by the Assessing Officer and increases require service of a notice of demand. A four year outer limitation from the end of the financial year of the original order or intimation applies, subject to section 288, and taxpayer applications must be disposed within six months of the relevant month end.
    Act RulesIncome Tax
    Show AI Summary
    Time limits for tax assessments impose short limitation windows, with tolling for procedural delays and transfer pricing processes.
    Section 286 prescribes specific limitation periods for assessments, reassessments and recomputations linked to dates in a statutory table, generally imposing one year windows with limited shorter periods; it provides a 12 month extension where a Transfer Pricing Officer reference is made, enumerates discrete exclusion/tolling events (including hearings, stays, audit and valuation references, advance ruling applications, exchange of information references, declarations under anti avoidance provisions and search/requisition periods), and supplies minimum residual time and remedial extension rules to ensure Assessing Officers retain a baseline time to conclude proceedings.
    Act RulesIncome Tax
    Show AI Summary
    Mandatory cessation of reassessment proceedings when taxpayer demonstrates assessed amount meets correct liability, limiting assessing officer discretion.
    Section 285 fixes tax in section 279 proceedings at rates as if escaped income were included, conditions mandatory cessation of those proceedings on two cumulative showings by the assessee (assessment not lower than correct liability or properly made assessment/computation, and absence of any impugnment under specified challenge provisions), and renders final that cessation by barring reopening of matters concluded by listed orders; procedural modalities and evidentiary standards are not specified.
    Act RulesIncome Tax
    Show AI Summary
    Assessment notices to implement appellate orders may be issued at any time, subject to existing time-bar exceptions.
    Clause 283 permits issuance of a section 280 notice at any time to make assessments, reassessments or recomputations to give effect to appellate orders or Approving Panel directions, but it does not apply where, at the time the triggering order or reference occurred, other statutory time-limiting provisions already precluded assessment for the tax year concerned; the enacted text narrows the express override language compared with the Bill, potentially limiting displacement of constraints within the omitted procedural provision.

    TMI Notes

    Back

    All TMI Notes

    Showing Results for :
    Reset Filters
      No Records Found

      TMI Notes

      Back

      All TMI Notes

      whatsappJoin Channel
      Showing Results for : Reset Filters

      Comprehensive Legal Analysis of Jurisdictional Challenges and SEBI's Regulatory Framework in Securities Litigation

      25 January, 2024

      Contents
      Acts
      Rules & Regulations
      Plus +
      Summary
      Note

      Note

      -

      Bookmark

      Print

      Print

      Deciphering Legal Judgments: A Comprehensive Analysis of Case Law

      Reported as:

      2023 (12) TMI 915 - DELHI HIGH COURT

      Introduction: The legal landscape of securities regulation in India, particularly under the ambit of the Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI), presents a unique confluence of jurisdictional challenges and regulatory complexities. This commentary meticulously analyzes the multifaceted legal issues arising from a recent case involving territorial jurisdiction and the application of the doctrine of forum non-conveniens, intertwined with the procedural and substantive aspects of SEBI’s regulatory and enforcement mechanisms.

      I. Territorial Jurisdiction and Forum Non-Conveniens: An In-Depth Legal Examination

      The heart of the dispute lies in the preliminary objections raised concerning the territorial jurisdiction of the High Court in SEBI-related litigation. These objections bring forth the nuanced interpretation of territorial jurisdiction, particularly in the context of corporate and securities law. The argument pivots on the extent to which the High Court can exercise jurisdiction over matters involving statutory bodies like SEBI and corporate entities, especially when actions and decisions central to the dispute have occurred outside the court's territorial limits.

      The concept of forum non-conveniens, which addresses the appropriateness of a forum for adjudicating a dispute, is also critical. This doctrine is pivotal in deciding whether the litigation should proceed in the jurisdiction where it was filed or be relocated to a more suitable jurisdiction, considering factors such as the convenience of parties, location of evidence, and interests of justice.

      II. SEBI’s Settlement Process and Revocation of Settlement Orders

      The procedural journey and substantive analysis of SEBI's regulatory framework, particularly the settlement mechanism under the SEBI (Settlement Proceedings) Regulation 2018, are crucial. This mechanism allows for the resolution of disputes through settlement rather than litigation, providing an efficient alternative to lengthy court procedures. However, the revocation of such settlements, as observed in this case, raises important questions about the boundaries of regulatory discretion and the criteria for compliance. The legal implications of such revocations are significant, impacting not only the parties involved but also the broader landscape of securities regulation and corporate governance.

      III. The Role of High Courts in SEBI Matters

      The jurisdictional reach of High Courts in India, especially in matters involving SEBI, is a subject of intricate legal analysis. The interpretation of the High Court's powers under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, particularly in the post-amendment era, is essential. The cause of action as a basis for jurisdiction, its interaction with the doctrine of forum conveniens, and the subsequent determination of the most suitable venue for securities law litigation are critical aspects of this discussion.

      IV. Implications for Corporate Governance and Securities Regulation

      This case also has broader implications for corporate governance and securities regulation. The issues related to non-compliance with SEBI's norms and the resulting legal battles underscore the importance of adhering to regulatory requirements. The case highlights the need for robust governance structures within corporations and the critical role of regulatory bodies like SEBI in maintaining market integrity and protecting investor interests.

      V. Conclusion

      In conclusion, this case presents an intricate tapestry of legal issues, encompassing jurisdictional debates, regulatory mechanisms, and their impact on corporate governance. The detailed analysis of each aspect provides valuable insights into the complexities of securities law litigation in India. It underscores the critical role of judicial and regulatory bodies in upholding legal and ethical standards in the corporate sector, ensuring fair practices, and maintaining the integrity of financial markets. The commentary illustrates the interplay between jurisdictional challenges and regulatory compliance, offering a thorough understanding of the legal framework governing securities regulation in India.

       


      Full Text:

      2023 (12) TMI 915 - DELHI HIGH COURT

      Topics

      ActsIncome Tax