Loading...

⚠ โœ•
❮ Top
☎ Help
Draft upto 3 replies to a
tax notice โ€” FREE ๐ŸŽ‰ โœ•

150 credits ยท 30 days

โ€ข Basic Search โ†’ 1 Credit
โ€ข Advanced Search โ†’ 3 Credits
โ€ข Drafter โ†’ 20 to extract + 25 per issue
(โ‰ˆ upto 2-3 drafts on us)

Already used our earlier 20-Credit Demo?
You are still eligible for this new 150-Credit Demo.

Activate your FREE Demo โ†’
☰
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedbackโœ•

Contact Us At :

✉ E-mail: [email protected]

✆ Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters 0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

1980 (9) TMI 112

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....the CIT (A) for the asst. yr. 1973-74: "That on the facts and in the circumstances of the case the CIT (A) erred in setting aside the assessment order passed by the ITO under s. 144 of the IT Act, 1961". 2. The assessee is a company and the relevant asst. yr. is 1973-74. The corresponding accounting year ended on 31st March, 1973. The corresponding accounting year ended on 31st March, 1973. ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ortunity should be allowed to the assessee company for production of evidences and material on which the later might rely. 4. After hearing both sides and going through the cases cited by the Revenue-Muthuwappy vs. CIT 46 ITR 1107 (Mad) and Girdhar Zavar vs. CIT 24 ITR 540 (Bombay), we partly agreed with the Commissioner (A). The latter had reasoned well in setting aside the assessment because ....