Loading...

⚠ โœ•
❮ Top
☎ Help
Draft upto 3 replies to a
tax notice โ€” FREE ๐ŸŽ‰ โœ•

150 credits ยท 30 days

โ€ข Basic Search โ†’ 1 Credit
โ€ข Advanced Search โ†’ 3 Credits
โ€ข Drafter โ†’ 20 to extract + 25 per issue
(โ‰ˆ upto 2-3 drafts on us)

Already used our earlier 20-Credit Demo?
You are still eligible for this new 150-Credit Demo.

Activate your FREE Demo โ†’
☰
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedbackโœ•

Contact Us At :

✉ E-mail: [email protected]

✆ Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters 0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

2005 (9) TMI 189

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ppellants filed a Bill of Entry dated 3-3-99 for clearance of 99 pieces of Olympus cameras of different models imported from Singapore. The value of the goods was declared as US $ 3425 C&F and, on this basis, the Bill of Entry was assessed to duty of Rs. 93,099/- and the goods were cleared for home consumption. Subsequent investigations conducted by the Customs authorities resulted in the discover....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... cameras (which was available) with redemption fine of Rs. 27,000/- and also imposed redemption fine of Rs. 3,30,000/- in lieu of confiscation of the remaining cameras (not available for confiscation). The order of confiscation of the 10 cameras with redemption fine of Rs. 27,000/- is not contested. However, appellants have challenged the fine of Rs. 3.30 lakhs imposed on them in lieu of the camer....