<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (9) TMI 189 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=54783</link>
    <description>Redemption fine cannot be imposed in lieu of confiscation when the goods are unavailable for confiscation, because they cannot be redeemed and the basis for such fine does not survive. The redemption fine was therefore deleted. Penalty equal to the duty demand under the Customs Act may be reduced where it is harsh in the circumstances. Applying this principle, the penalty was substantially reduced, and the order was modified in favour of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 23 Sep 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 22 Oct 2010 10:29:55 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=93260" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (9) TMI 189 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=54783</link>
      <description>Redemption fine cannot be imposed in lieu of confiscation when the goods are unavailable for confiscation, because they cannot be redeemed and the basis for such fine does not survive. The redemption fine was therefore deleted. Penalty equal to the duty demand under the Customs Act may be reduced where it is harsh in the circumstances. Applying this principle, the penalty was substantially reduced, and the order was modified in favour of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 23 Sep 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=54783</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>