Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

2005 (3) TMI 369

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....(J) (Oral)]. - There is a demand of duty of over Rs. 18 lakhs on the appellants, which is consequential to denial of SSI exemption under Notification No. 1/93-C.E. (as amended). The lower authorities have found that the subject goods were cleared by the party under a brand name which belonged to a Sri Lankan company and, therefore, they were hit by the bar of para-4 of the Notification, whereunder....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....t by the bar contained in para 4 of the notification. Ld. SDR has relied on the Supreme Court's judgment in Emkay Investments (P) Ltd. - 2004 (174) E.L.T. 298 (S.C.). 2. Ld. Counsel has, fairly, placed on record a copy of letter dt. 15-8-1997 of M/s. Ritzbury Lanka (Private) Ltd., wherein the appellant-company was given the right to manufacture and market products of the 'Ritzbury' range under ....