2005 (3) TMI 368

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....-appeal passed by the Commissioner (Appeals) whereby Modvat credit in respect of the capital goods was denied on the ground that the capital goods were sold to the finance company. Therefore, the appellants are not entitled to take credit in respect of the duty paid on the capital goods. 3. The contention of the appellant is that the appellant after taking the credit on the capital goods sold the....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....lpool of India Ltd. v. CC, New Delhi reported in 2003 (58) RLT 241. The contention of the appellant in the above decisions of the Tribunal it was held that when the goods were not removed from the factory, the credit cannot be denied even in the case of sale of the factory. 5. The contention of the Revenue is that the appellant after taking the credit sold the capital goods, therefore, the owner....