2026 (8) TMI 171

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... statutory provision conferring a right to make a representation or requiring the authority to decide such representation, a Constitutional Court ought to issue directions for its consideration. 2. The Petitioners have filed the present Writ Petition, inter alia, seeking the following reliefs: "A. issue a writ of certiorari, or a writ, order or direction in the nature thereof, quashing and setting aside the Final Findings dated 12.06.2026 bearing F. No. 6/17/2025-DGTR issued by Respondent No. 2 in Case No. AD(OI)-15/2025, insofar as they determine material injury and causal link and recommend the imposition of antidumping duty on imports of the subject goods from China; B. issue a writ of mandamus, or a writ, order or d....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....Republic of China (hereinafter referred to as 'Impugned Final Findings'). The recommendations contained in the Impugned Final Findings are yet to be accepted and notified by the Central Government. 5. Learned counsel representing the Respondents submits that despite the public notice issued during the investigation, the Petitioners did not participate in the investigation proceedings. It is submitted that in exercise of powers under Rules 6(5) and 6(6) of the Customs Tariff (Identification, Assessment and Collection of Anti-Dumping Duty on Dumped Articles and for Determination of Injury) Rules, 1995 ('Anti-Dumping Rules'), Respondent No. 2 had invited all users, importers and user associations to register themselves as interested parties....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ge is reached when no record is available regarding his previous service. In the representations which he makes in 2000, he claims that he should be taken back to service. But on rejection of the said representation by order dated 9-4-2002, he filed a writ petition claiming service benefits, by referring the said order of rejection as the cause of action. As noticed above, the learned Single Judge examined the claim, as if it was a live claim made in time, finds fault with the respondents for not producing material to show that termination was preceded by due enquiry and declares the termination as illegal. But as the petitioner has already reached the age of superannuation, the learned Single Judge grants the relief of pension with effect ....