https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=796298 Recommendatory anti-dumping final findings do not create a statutory obligation to consider representations against them before a Central Government notification is issued. A writ direction cannot create a remedy unavailable under law or compel a decision on representations where no statutory duty exists. As the findings had not yet resulted in notification and a statutory appeal to CESTAT would be available after notification, the requested writ intervention was premature. The High Court therefore declined to direct consideration of the representations or exercise writ jurisdiction. en-us Tue, 28 Jul 2026 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 04 Aug 2026 08:39:34 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=796298 Recommendatory anti-dumping final findings do not create a statutory obligation to consider representations against them before a Central Government notification is issued. A writ direction cannot create a remedy unavailable under law or compel a decision on representations where no statutory duty exists. As the findings had not yet resulted in notification and a statutory appeal to CESTAT would be available after notification, the requested writ intervention was premature. The High Court therefore declined to direct consideration of the representations or exercise writ jurisdiction. Case-Laws Customs Tue, 28 Jul 2026 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=796298