2018 (8) TMI 2183
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... Advocates for the Appellants Shri Vivek Pandey, AR for the Respondent ORDER Per Rachna Gupta: Present appeal is directed against the order of Commissioner (Appeals) dated 3.12.2014. The only point to be considered herein is whether the appeal of the appellant has been rightly dismissed in terms of provisions of 35 F of Central Excise Act, 1944 for want of the mandatory compliance of C....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
..../8/2014 -CX dated 16.09.2014. It is alleged that same has not been considered by the Commissioner (Appeals). Therefore, it is prayed that the impugned order be set aside. 4. While rebutting this argument, learned DR has mentioned that there are number of applications made for getting the mistake as mentioned herein to have been correct. The said procedure has not been complied with. There was n....
TaxTMI