<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (8) TMI 2183 - CESTAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=470635</link>
    <description>Mandatory pre-deposit compliance cannot be rejected solely because payment was made under an incorrect assessee code where the amount corresponding to the required duty percentage was paid and the discrepancy was notified. Verification of the payment is necessary before determining whether the pre-deposit condition has been met. Dismissal without that verification is unsustainable, requiring the matter to be reconsidered after verification and fresh adjudication.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 08 Aug 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 03 Aug 2026 10:54:39 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=914996" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (8) TMI 2183 - CESTAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=470635</link>
      <description>Mandatory pre-deposit compliance cannot be rejected solely because payment was made under an incorrect assessee code where the amount corresponding to the required duty percentage was paid and the discrepancy was notified. Verification of the payment is necessary before determining whether the pre-deposit condition has been met. Dismissal without that verification is unsustainable, requiring the matter to be reconsidered after verification and fresh adjudication.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 08 Aug 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=470635</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>