2026 (6) TMI 1238

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....mit Tiwari, CGSC, Mr. Chaitanya Puri, Ms. Ayushi Srivastava, Mr. Ayush Tanwar, Mr. Arpan Narwal, Mr. Kushagra Malik, Mr. Ujjwal Tyagi, Advocates. JUDGEMENT PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAV, J. (ORAL) 1. The instant petition is for the following reliefs:- "(a) Issue an appropriate writ/order/direction to facilitate change of the status of the company from "struck off" in order to fix the....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that before striking off the name of the petitioner's company, the mandatory procedure under Section 560 of the Companies Act, 1956 ('the Act') was completely disregarded. He points out that the Registrar of Companies never issued the first letter of inquiry under Section 560(1), nor the second notice by registered post under Section 560....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ation dated 23.06.2007, heavily relied upon by the respondent, does not pertain to the Petitioner's company. The company listed at Serial No. 6719 bears Corporate Identification Number (CIN) U99999DL1990PTC039734. The petitioner's company, however, has a distinct and different CIN, i.e., U51900DL1990PTC039734. This Court is of the considered opinion that a notice or notification issued for....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....h Thakur Singh v. State of Gujarat (1981) 1 SCC 495 has further held that a party is entitled to wait until the last day of limitation to avail a legal remedy. Hence, the objection of delay is rejected. 7. The respondent's contention that the Petitioner should have availed the alternative statutory remedy before the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT) is found to be without merit. Since th....