https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=793857 Mandatory notice and inquiry requirements for striking off a company's name were not complied with, and the Gazette notification relied on related to a different CIN, so the striking off was invalid and void ab initio. The court also rejected objections based on delay and alternative remedy, noting that restoration was sought within the statutory period and that the existence of a statutory forum did not bar writ relief where the foundational strike-off action itself was defective. The company's name was directed to be restored to the register of companies. en-us Wed, 29 Apr 2026 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 25 Jun 2026 08:27:32 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=793857 Mandatory notice and inquiry requirements for striking off a company's name were not complied with, and the Gazette notification relied on related to a different CIN, so the striking off was invalid and void ab initio. The court also rejected objections based on delay and alternative remedy, noting that restoration was sought within the statutory period and that the existence of a statutory forum did not bar writ relief where the foundational strike-off action itself was defective. The company's name was directed to be restored to the register of companies. Case-Laws Companies Law Wed, 29 Apr 2026 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=793857