2026 (6) TMI 53

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....titled M/s Kaliyar Darbar and Company v. Secretary, Krishi Utpadan Mandi Samiti, Pilibhit. The petitioner has also prayed for a direction restraining respondent no. 3 from evicting the petitioner from Shop No. 113-Sa. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner participated in the auction conducted for carrying on the business of vegetables and fruits in Navin Mandi Asthal, Pilibhit, and emerged as the highest bidder for Shop No. 113-Sa with a bid amount of Rs. 15,80,000/- along with GST of Rs. 2,84,400/-. Consequently, the shop was allotted to the petitioner vide order dated 31.05.2022. 4. It is further submitted that on 28.07.2022, the petitioner deposited 50% of the bid amount, i.e. Rs. 7,90,000/-, along with ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....o the petitioner to file a fresh revision before respondent no. 2. Pursuant thereto, the petitioner filed a fresh revision, which has again been rejected vide the impugned order dated 26.09.2025 on the ground that the petitioner had failed to deposit 50% of the bid amount. It is thus contended that both the impugned orders have been passed arbitrarily and illegally and are liable to be set aside. 7. Per contra, learned counsel appearing for respondent no. 3 submits that the petitioner failed to deposit 50% of the auction amount within the stipulated period. It is stated that notices dated 11.01.2023, 13.02.2023, 17.04.2023, 27.08.2023 and 19.07.2024 were issued to the petitioner requiring payment of the outstanding amount. It is further ....