https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=792672 Cancellation of the shop allotment was unsustainable because the required 50% bid payment had in fact been made on behalf of the allottee and received by the authority. The record showed deposits credited to the petitioner's account on several dates, and the authority did not dispute receipt of those amounts. On that factual basis, the Court held that the payment obligation stood satisfied and there was no lawful ground to cancel the allotment. The cancellation order and the revisional order were set aside, and allotment of Shop No. 113-Sa was directed to be made in favour of the petitioner. en-us Fri, 15 May 2026 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 01 Jun 2026 08:25:53 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=792672 Cancellation of the shop allotment was unsustainable because the required 50% bid payment had in fact been made on behalf of the allottee and received by the authority. The record showed deposits credited to the petitioner's account on several dates, and the authority did not dispute receipt of those amounts. On that factual basis, the Court held that the payment obligation stood satisfied and there was no lawful ground to cancel the allotment. The cancellation order and the revisional order were set aside, and allotment of Shop No. 113-Sa was directed to be made in favour of the petitioner. Case-Laws GST Fri, 15 May 2026 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=792672