2026 (5) TMI 983

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....LOK ARADHE For the Appellant(s): Mr. K. S. Mahadevan, Adv., Ms. Swati Bansal, Adv., Mr. R. Rangarajan, Adv., Mr. Aravind Gopinathan, Adv., Mr. Rajesh Kumar, AOR. For Respondent(s) : Mr. Anant Gautam, AOR, Mr Rajesh Kumar Gautam, Adv., Mr Rishi Chouhan, Adv., Keith Varghese, AOR. ORDER 1. This Civil Appeal is against an interim order passed by the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ry Application. Thus, the present appeal. 4. We are informed by learned counsel for the appellant that, pending disposal of the proceedings initiated under Section 7, the ex-parte order passed by the DRT dated 12.04.2022 was set aside on 12.03.2026. Consequently, even the recovery certificate was closed. These facts were not brought to the notice of the Tribunal(s). 5. While issuing notice, ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....pose of the appeal in accordance with law. 7. The appellant will be entitled to bring to the notice of NCLAT the subsequent development of setting aside the ex-parte order of DRT on 12.03.2026 and recall of the Recovery Certificate dated 20.03.2026. Equally, the respondents will be entitled to file an affidavit before the NCLAT to bring on record the necessary facts of the case. The parties may....