<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (5) TMI 983 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=791781</link>
    <description>Interim protection in a corporate insolvency resolution process was continued after the ex parte DRT order had been recalled and the recovery certificate closed, developments not placed before the Tribunal below. The SC directed the NCLAT to hear and dispose of the appeal afresh in accordance with law, after allowing both sides to place the updated facts and additional documents on record. No view was expressed on the merits, and the matter was to be decided on the revised record.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 11 May 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 18 May 2026 08:40:38 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=902517" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (5) TMI 983 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=791781</link>
      <description>Interim protection in a corporate insolvency resolution process was continued after the ex parte DRT order had been recalled and the recovery certificate closed, developments not placed before the Tribunal below. The SC directed the NCLAT to hear and dispose of the appeal afresh in accordance with law, after allowing both sides to place the updated facts and additional documents on record. No view was expressed on the merits, and the matter was to be decided on the revised record.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>IBC</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 11 May 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=791781</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>