2026 (5) TMI 935
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....ishi Murarka, Adv., Ms. Shreya Kasera, Adv., For the Respondent(s): None. ORDER 1. This petition arises from a very innocuous order passed by the High Court dated 06.05.2026 in Writ Petition No. 17094/2025 by which the Writ Petition preferred by the petitioner before us came to be rejected. The impugned order reads thus:- "1. On 22nd April 2026, we had passed a detailed or....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....the matter and if possible, take instructions from the authority concerned and come back in the second session. 4. Mr. Raghavendra P. Shankar has been kind enough to look into the matter and was also able to take instructions from the authority concerned. 5. We also take notice of the order passed by the High Court dated 22.04.2026. The same reads thus:- "1. Stand over to 06 May 202....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....around re-export of the goods. In the past, the High Court did grant an opportunity to the petitioner to re-export the goods but the opportunity was not availed of. 7. In such circumstances, the High Court was left with no other option but to pass the impugned order. 8. We would like to give one last opportunity to the petitioner to ensure that the goods are re-exported. 9. It is not in d....
TaxTMI