<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (5) TMI 935 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=791733</link>
    <description>A dispute over re-export of goods turned on whether a final further opportunity should be granted to complete compliance after an earlier chance had not been used. The Court, noting that the penalty amount had already been deposited and considering the circumstances, exercised its discretion to allow one last limited extension. The petitioner was given four weeks to complete the re-export process, and the matter was disposed of on that basis.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 13 May 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 16 May 2026 09:09:51 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=902364" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (5) TMI 935 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=791733</link>
      <description>A dispute over re-export of goods turned on whether a final further opportunity should be granted to complete compliance after an earlier chance had not been used. The Court, noting that the penalty amount had already been deposited and considering the circumstances, exercised its discretion to allow one last limited extension. The petitioner was given four weeks to complete the re-export process, and the matter was disposed of on that basis.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 13 May 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=791733</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>