2026 (4) TMI 712
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... Mr Justice Abdul Quddhose For the Petitioner : Mr. AR.L. Sundaresan Additional Solicitor General for Mrs. Revathi Manivannan Senior Standing Counsel For the Respondents : Tribunal [R1], Mr. Raghavan Ramabadran [R2] ORDER This Writ Petition has been filed by the petitioner (Customs Department) challenging the impugned order, dated 22.12.2025 passed by the 1st respondent (CESTAT) in Mis....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.....2025 passed by this Court in W.P.No.50475 of 2025, which has been filed by the 2nd respondent, in respect of the very same goods, which is the subject matter of this writ petition. He would submit that in the said order, a positive direction has been issued to the Customs Department to forthwith release the subject goods to the 2nd respondent, subject to the 2nd respondent depositing a sum of Rs.....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....ideration. He would also submit that a review application has been filed by the petitioner seeking for review of the order, dated 26.12.2025 passed by this Court in W.P.No.50475 of 2025, since the order dated 26.12.2025 has not considered the objections raised by the petitioner with regard to grant of provisional release of the goods and the said order was also passed without granting an opportuni....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....y be issued to the 1st respondent (CESTAT) to dispose of the main appeal on merits and in accordance with law as expeditiously as possible. He would also submit, on instructions, that after recording the undertaking given by the petitioner (Customs Department) that they shall not destroy the subject goods or alienate the same, a direction may be issued to the 1st respondent (CESTAT) to dispose of ....
TaxTMI