<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (4) TMI 712 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=789643</link>
    <description>A non-speaking provisional-release order that failed to address the Customs Department&#039;s material objections could not be sustained and was set aside. Because the goods had a limited shelf life and the main customs appeal was already pending, the Tribunal was directed to decide the appeal expeditiously on merits. The Department&#039;s undertaking not to destroy or alienate the goods pending disposal was recorded.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 28 Jan 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Apr 2026 08:53:07 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=896332" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (4) TMI 712 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=789643</link>
      <description>A non-speaking provisional-release order that failed to address the Customs Department&#039;s material objections could not be sustained and was set aside. Because the goods had a limited shelf life and the main customs appeal was already pending, the Tribunal was directed to decide the appeal expeditiously on merits. The Department&#039;s undertaking not to destroy or alienate the goods pending disposal was recorded.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 28 Jan 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=789643</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>