2026 (2) TMI 242

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ates For the Respondents : Mr. Harish Narasappa, Senior Advocate For Advocates Saurav Sunil & Joel Jacob ORDER Oral Judgment : Justice Sharad Kumar Sharma, Member (Judicial): The Appellant who happens to be the Petitioner in the Company Petition No. 125 / BB / 2025, challenges the impugned order of 25.09.2025, as it was passed in the aforesaid Company Petition, whereby, the interim relief as sought in the Company Petition was declined to be granted in view of the findings, which has been recorded by the Ld. Adjudicating Authority in the impugned order. Simultaneously, by the same order, the Ld. Tribunal took cognizance to the proceedings in the Company Petition and had recorded that the reply / objections to the Company Petition....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....t, the suit has not been withdrawn and it is still pending consideration and his application under Order VII Rule 11 of C.P.C. is pending consideration. 6. In that eventuality, it would be deemed that the subject matter of the Company Petition is yet to be taken up in the Civil Court proceedings. However, this aspect may not have any bearing as far as the issue pertaining to the challenge given to the impugned order is concerned. 7. Primarily, the Interim Relief, sought by the Appellant in the Company Petition, was that the Respondents be restrained from (i) removing the Appellant from the Directorship of the Company and (ii) from terminating his position as HoD / Consultant of the Hospital of the Respondent No. 1 Company which they h....