<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (2) TMI 242 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=786047</link>
    <description>Interim relief in the company petition was declined because the requested injunction would have conflicted with an existing civil court order and the earlier vacation of interim protection. The relief initially sought concerned restraint on removal from directorship and termination from the hospital role, but the subsequent EGM removing the appellant from directorship was not part of the original challenge, so continuance as director could not be ordered without assailing that EGM. Allegations of forum shopping and the pending nature of the company petition also weighed against appellate intervention at the interim stage. Refusal of interim relief was therefore upheld.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 05 Feb 2026 09:16:08 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=884353" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (2) TMI 242 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=786047</link>
      <description>Interim relief in the company petition was declined because the requested injunction would have conflicted with an existing civil court order and the earlier vacation of interim protection. The relief initially sought concerned restraint on removal from directorship and termination from the hospital role, but the subsequent EGM removing the appellant from directorship was not part of the original challenge, so continuance as director could not be ordered without assailing that EGM. Allegations of forum shopping and the pending nature of the company petition also weighed against appellate intervention at the interim stage. Refusal of interim relief was therefore upheld.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=786047</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>