https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=786047 Contradictory pleadings and parallel civil proceedings defeated a claim for interim relief restraining removal as director; the appellant's attempt to introduce a postpetition EGM challenge via a company application under the oppression and mismanagement remedy was held not properly before the principal company petition, so injunctive protection for continuance as director could not be granted. The tribunal relied on the absence of a proper challenge to the EGM resolution within the principal petition and the existence of an extant suit/application to refuse a conflicting interim stay. Consequence: the company appeal was dismissed for lack of merit. en-us Tue, 06 Jan 2026 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 05 Feb 2026 09:16:08 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=786047 Contradictory pleadings and parallel civil proceedings defeated a claim for interim relief restraining removal as director; the appellant's attempt to introduce a postpetition EGM challenge via a company application under the oppression and mismanagement remedy was held not properly before the principal company petition, so injunctive protection for continuance as director could not be granted. The tribunal relied on the absence of a proper challenge to the EGM resolution within the principal petition and the existence of an extant suit/application to refuse a conflicting interim stay. Consequence: the company appeal was dismissed for lack of merit. Case-Laws Companies Law Tue, 06 Jan 2026 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=786047