2005 (4) TMI 102
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....[Order per : Krishna Kumar, Member (J)]. - Heard both sides. 2. The issues involved is whether the volume of work handled at Kandla and the volume of work handled at Mumbai are to be taken to fulfil the norms laid down under the Public Notice. 3. The learned Counsel appearing for the appellants submitted that the appellant was granted a CHA licence at Kandla and Mumbai on the regular basis. ....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....t Petition No. 180/2004. The contention of the learned Counsel for the appellants is that due to cyclone at Kandla Port, the licence granted for the Port remained un-operational and the major work of Kandla Port was transferred to Mumbai Port for handling. If during the relevant period, the volume of work handled by the appellant at Kandla as well as Mumbai Port are taken together, it will appear ....
Generate professional replies, appeals, opinions to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
TaxTMI