https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=49019 The case involved a dispute over the revocation of a CHA license at Kandla and Mumbai due to alleged failure to meet prescribed norms. The appellants argued that work handled at both locations should be considered to fulfill requirements. The tribunal, following a High Court directive, allowed the appeals, stating that work at all permitted Customs stations should be considered. Despite a cyclone at Kandla, work diverted to Mumbai was deemed relevant. The tribunal found no restriction in Public Notices, permitting consideration of work at one station. Therefore, the revocation was overturned, allowing work at Mumbai Port to contribute to meeting licensing norms. en-us Fri, 08 Apr 2005 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 09 Aug 2010 10:57:26 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=49019 The case involved a dispute over the revocation of a CHA license at Kandla and Mumbai due to alleged failure to meet prescribed norms. The appellants argued that work handled at both locations should be considered to fulfill requirements. The tribunal, following a High Court directive, allowed the appeals, stating that work at all permitted Customs stations should be considered. Despite a cyclone at Kandla, work diverted to Mumbai was deemed relevant. The tribunal found no restriction in Public Notices, permitting consideration of work at one station. Therefore, the revocation was overturned, allowing work at Mumbai Port to contribute to meeting licensing norms. Case-Laws Customs Fri, 08 Apr 2005 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=49019