Loading...

⚠ โœ•
❮ Top
☎ Help
Draft upto 3 replies to a
tax notice โ€” FREE ๐ŸŽ‰ โœ•

150 credits ยท 30 days

โ€ข Basic Search โ†’ 1 Credit
โ€ข Advanced Search โ†’ 3 Credits
โ€ข Drafter โ†’ 20 to extract + 25 per issue
(โ‰ˆ upto 2-3 drafts on us)

Already used our earlier 20-Credit Demo?
You are still eligible for this new 150-Credit Demo.

Activate your FREE Demo โ†’
☰
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedbackโœ•

Contact Us At :

✉ E-mail: [email protected]

✆ Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters 0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

2002 (2) TMI 139

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....r per : Justice K.K. Usha, President]. - The present appeal which is referred for being considered by the Larger Bench relates to the maintainability of an appeal before the Tribunal from an interim order of stay passed by the Commissioner (Appeals) under Section 35F of the Central Excise Act, 1944. 2. The appellant herein challenged the interim order passed by the Commissioner (Appeals) before....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ding maintainability of an appeal before this Tribunal against the interim order passed by the Commissioner (Appeals). The learned Single Member also observed that in Jain Engineering Company v. Collector of Customs, Bombay [1994 (71) E.L.T. 321 (S.C.) = 1994 (1) RLT 50 Supreme Court] dismissed the assessee's appeal on the ground that the appeal before the Tribunal was not against any final order ....