https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=48913 The Tribunal was asked whether it should rule on the maintainability of an appeal against an interim stay order passed by the Commissioner (Appeals) under Section 35F of the Central Excise Act, 1944, in light of a binding High Court order between the parties. It declined to examine maintainability in this proceeding, returned the reference petition, and directed that the appeal be heard on merits by the learned Single Member. en-us Mon, 04 Feb 2002 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 07 Aug 2010 12:07:50 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=48913 The Tribunal was asked whether it should rule on the maintainability of an appeal against an interim stay order passed by the Commissioner (Appeals) under Section 35F of the Central Excise Act, 1944, in light of a binding High Court order between the parties. It declined to examine maintainability in this proceeding, returned the reference petition, and directed that the appeal be heard on merits by the learned Single Member. Case-Laws Central Excise Mon, 04 Feb 2002 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=48913