Assessment under section 44AD upheld at 8% of turnover; unexplained immovable investment disallowed for lack of proof

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ITAT affirmed the assessment: the AO's computation of business income at 8% of turnover under section 44AD was sustained, with CIT(A)'s concurrence upheld as a correct finding. Separately, additions relating to acquisition of an immovable asset were also upheld because the assessee failed to discharge the initial onus to establish receipts from relatives-no satisfactory identity, PAN/return evidence, bank statements evidencing receipt/debit, confirmation, repayment records or proof of creditworthiness were furnished. Consequently, the unexplained investment was disallowed and the assessee's appeal was dismissed in its entirety.....