Introducing the “In Favour Of” filter in Case Laws.
- ⚖️ Instantly identify judgments decided in favour of the Assessee, Revenue, or Appellant
- 🔍 Narrow down results with higher precision
Try it now in Case Laws →
TaxTMI Login
🚀 New Feature Launched ✕
Just a moment...
Introducing the “In Favour Of” filter in Case Laws.
Try it now in Case Laws →
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Highlights
of of All Highlights
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of ITAT affirmed the assessment: the AO's computation of business income at 8% of turnover under section 44AD was sustained, with CIT(A)'s concurrence upheld as a correct finding. Separately, additions relating to acquisition of an immovable asset were also upheld because the assessee failed to discharge the initial onus to establish receipts from relatives-no satisfactory identity, PAN/return evidence, bank statements evidencing receipt/debit, confirmation, repayment records or proof of creditworthiness were furnished. Consequently, the unexplained investment was disallowed and the assessee's appeal was dismissed in its entirety.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
