2025 (11) TMI 662

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... i/b. Pulkit Tyagi. For the Respondent No. 1: Ms. Maya Majumdar a/w Sangeeta Yadav. For Respondent No. 2: Ms. Jyoti Chavan, Addl. G.P.. P.C.:- 1. Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2. The Petitioner challenges the order in original dated 29 January 2025 on the ground that the Central Authorities could not have initiated any proceedings or made this order because the State Author....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....shed in M/S. Armour Security (supra) could be stated to be attracted to the facts of the present case. The Appellate Authority can best undertake the said exercise. 5. The Appellant makes out no exceptional case for us to deviate us the practice of exhaustion of alternate remedies. In the case of Oberoi Constructions Ltd. vs. The Union of India and Ors. O.S. Writ Petition (L) No.33260 of 2023 d....