<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (11) TMI 662 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=781194</link>
    <description>HC refused to entertain the petition, holding that the petitioner must exhaust alternate remedies and that the Appellate Authority is best placed to examine complex issues raised. The court found no exceptional circumstances to depart from the practice of requiring an appeal under the CGST Act, declined relief, and granted liberty to challenge the impugned order by instituting the statutory appeal. Petition disposed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 08 Oct 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 12 Nov 2025 08:17:49 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=863877" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (11) TMI 662 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=781194</link>
      <description>HC refused to entertain the petition, holding that the petitioner must exhaust alternate remedies and that the Appellate Authority is best placed to examine complex issues raised. The court found no exceptional circumstances to depart from the practice of requiring an appeal under the CGST Act, declined relief, and granted liberty to challenge the impugned order by instituting the statutory appeal. Petition disposed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 08 Oct 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=781194</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>