TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
2005 (9) TMI 105
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... whereby it dismissed the appeal of the petitioner. The petitioner moved an application for rectification of mistake in the order dated 12-6-2003. This application was filed on 17-10-2003. By order dated 11-2-2005 the Rectification of Mistake Application came to be rejected by the Tribunal in the following terms : "2. The present application has been filed seeking rectification of Bench Order dated 12-6-2003. Such rectification has been sought on the grounds that the Tribunal has not taken into consideration important grounds taken in the appeal and during the course of hearing including the applicants' grievance regarding violation of principle of natural justice before the Original Authority. We find that the learned Advocate who had arg....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....ially. 5. Mr. Malkan, appearing on behalf of the respondent authorities read out from the impugned order of Tribunal dated 11-2-2005 pointing out that the Rectification of Mistake Application had been rejected on three grounds : Firstly, that the case was argued by an Advocate who was not present at the time of hearing of the application; secondly, all the points argued by the Advocate who had appeared at the appeal hearing had been taken into consideration by the Bench; and thirdly, that the assessee was trying to seek review of the earlier order of the Bench. He also tried to place reliance on the order of Commissioner to insist that the grievance regarding violation of principles of natural justice was not correct, in as much as, the C....