<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (9) TMI 105 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=47634</link>
    <description>The court held that the Tribunal erred in rejecting the Rectification of Mistake Application and failing to adequately address the violation of principles of natural justice. The judgment quashed the Tribunal&#039;s order, restoring the application for rectification for a fresh decision. The petitioner&#039;s appeal to quash the earlier order was not granted. The petition was allowed, and the respondent-revenue was directed to pay costs of Rs. 2500.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 30 Sep 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 14 Mar 2020 13:40:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=86152" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (9) TMI 105 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=47634</link>
      <description>The court held that the Tribunal erred in rejecting the Rectification of Mistake Application and failing to adequately address the violation of principles of natural justice. The judgment quashed the Tribunal&#039;s order, restoring the application for rectification for a fresh decision. The petitioner&#039;s appeal to quash the earlier order was not granted. The petition was allowed, and the respondent-revenue was directed to pay costs of Rs. 2500.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 30 Sep 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=47634</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>