Loading...

⚠ โœ•
❮ Top
☎ Help
Draft upto 3 replies to a
tax notice โ€” FREE ๐ŸŽ‰ โœ•

150 credits ยท 30 days

โ€ข Basic Search โ†’ 1 Credit
โ€ข Advanced Search โ†’ 3 Credits
โ€ข Drafter โ†’ 20 to extract + 25 per issue
(โ‰ˆ upto 2-3 drafts on us)

Already used our earlier 20-Credit Demo?
You are still eligible for this new 150-Credit Demo.

Activate your FREE Demo โ†’
☰
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedbackโœ•

Contact Us At :

✉ E-mail: [email protected]

✆ Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters 0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

2005 (3) TMI 119

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....t is entitled to the benefit of the concessional rates of levy of excise duty under Notification 193/82, dated 11-6-1982 for the entire production during May to September 1982. 2. Before the said Notification (hereinafter referred to as 'the second notification') came into force, an earlier Notification being Notification 132/82,  dated 21-4-1982 had granted certain concessional rates of e....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....usionary clause by the inclusionary one, the assessee was entitled to the benefit of the Notification for the period in question. 5. Learned Counsel appearing for the respondents, however, contends that there was no question of the retrospective effect of the Notification as had been laid down by this Court in the Cannanore Spinning and Weaving Mills Ltd. v. The Collector of Customs and Central....