<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (3) TMI 119 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=47241</link>
    <description>A later fiscal notification extending concessional excise duty to sugar factories applied to the entire sugar year, because both the earlier exclusion and the later extension operated within the same statutory accounting period. The benefit was therefore available for the full period from 1 May 1982 to 30 September 1982, and the denial of concessional duty was unsustainable. The Court treated this as application within the same year rather than impermissible retrospective operation.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 02 Mar 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 Apr 2014 17:15:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=85760" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (3) TMI 119 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=47241</link>
      <description>A later fiscal notification extending concessional excise duty to sugar factories applied to the entire sugar year, because both the earlier exclusion and the later extension operated within the same statutory accounting period. The benefit was therefore available for the full period from 1 May 1982 to 30 September 1982, and the denial of concessional duty was unsustainable. The Court treated this as application within the same year rather than impermissible retrospective operation.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 02 Mar 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=47241</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>