2005 (2) TMI 133

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... by which the Designated Authority under the Customs Tariff Act, 1985 initiated a new shipper review in respect of the foreign exporter (being the Respondent Nos. 4, 5 and 6 herein) for the period 1st July, 2002 and 23rd May, 2003. By the Notification dated 23rd May, 2003, the Designated Authority sought to review an earlier Notification issued by the Central Government imposing anti-dumping duty ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....July, 2004 being Notification No. 80/2004. The earlier Notification issued on 1st July, 2003 ordering provisional assessment was rescinded by the Central Government by Notification No. 81/2004, dated 28 July, 2004. When these subsequent events were brought to this Court's notice, we were of the view that the appellants may ventilate their grievance against the impugned notifications and the final ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....s of Section 9C(5) of the Customs Tariff Act. 5.The matter was adjourned from time to time by this Court in order to enable the Union of India to clarify whether any President has been appointed of the Customs, Excise and Services Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) and if not, what steps had been taken to make such appointment. 6.Although several months have passed, admittedly, no President of ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... Tribunal] in exercise of the powers conferred by Sec.129(5) of the Customs Act, 1962 delegated his power and functions qua President in his absence, whether on leave or otherwise to the senior most Vice-President to perform such of the functions of the President as might be necessary for the efficient functioning of the Tribunal. Therefore until the President is appointed it would be open to the ....