<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (2) TMI 133 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=47229</link>
    <description>At an interim stage of a new shipper review, the Court noted that the appellants had already filed an appeal before the tribunal against the final findings and later notifications. It also observed that, under the statutory arrangement, the President&#039;s functions could be discharged by the senior-most Vice-President, so the absence of a President did not prevent the tribunal from proceeding. In these circumstances, continuing the present appeal would serve no useful purpose, and the appellants were left to advance all their contentions in the pending tribunal appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 09 Feb 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 Apr 2014 11:59:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=85748" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (2) TMI 133 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=47229</link>
      <description>At an interim stage of a new shipper review, the Court noted that the appellants had already filed an appeal before the tribunal against the final findings and later notifications. It also observed that, under the statutory arrangement, the President&#039;s functions could be discharged by the senior-most Vice-President, so the absence of a President did not prevent the tribunal from proceeding. In these circumstances, continuing the present appeal would serve no useful purpose, and the appellants were left to advance all their contentions in the pending tribunal appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 09 Feb 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=47229</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>