2025 (10) TMI 257
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....v Shanmuga with Mr. Chetan N. i/b Sriram Sridharan,. For the State of Maharashtra - Respondent: Mr Himanshu Takke, AGP. PC:- 1. Heard Mr. Sriram Sridhara, learned Counsel for the Appellant. 2. The challenge in this Appeal is to the interlocutory order dated 01 July 2025 directing the Appellant to make a part payment of Rs. 1 Crore by adjusting the amount of Rs. 3 Crores as a pre-condit....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....y which the Appellate Authority has exercised discretion. On perusing the impugned order, we cannot say that such discretion has been exercised perversely or by excluding the relevant considerations. 6. Secondly, the order impugned before the Appellate Authority raises a demand of almost Rs. 35 Crores. After accounting for the amounts already paid earlier by the Appellant, the Appellant is dire....
TaxTMI