https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=779461 An interlocutory order requiring part payment as a condition for stay of a substantial tax demand was upheld because the challenge did not disclose any question of law or any basis for appellate interference. The discretionary condition was found neither perverse nor arbitrary, and there was no indication that relevant considerations had been excluded. The asserted ceiling on liability was not accepted at this stage and was left to be examined in the appeal on merits. The challenge was therefore rejected, with the exercise of discretion treated as judicious. en-us Wed, 01 Oct 2025 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 07 Oct 2025 08:30:47 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=779461 An interlocutory order requiring part payment as a condition for stay of a substantial tax demand was upheld because the challenge did not disclose any question of law or any basis for appellate interference. The discretionary condition was found neither perverse nor arbitrary, and there was no indication that relevant considerations had been excluded. The asserted ceiling on liability was not accepted at this stage and was left to be examined in the appeal on merits. The challenge was therefore rejected, with the exercise of discretion treated as judicious. Case-Laws VAT / Sales Tax Wed, 01 Oct 2025 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=779461