2003 (9) TMI 107

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....or disposal. 2. The case of the petitioner is that, the Tribunal passed its earlier order dated 30-7-1996 wherein it wanted to follow its own order passed in Order No. 994 of 1996, dated 2-7-1996 which order related to the benefit of the Notification No. 36/87, dated 1-3-1987, while the present proceedings related to the benefit that was available to the Cement manufacturers under Notification ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... the Tribunal came to be considered with particular reference to Rule 41 of the Customs, Excise and Gold (Control) Appellate Tribunal (Procedure) Rules, 1982 and held that the Tribunal has got inherent jurisdiction to exercise such powers wherein to set aside a palpably erroneous order passed under misapprehension by it and a review on merits when the error sought to be corrected is one of law and....