https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=46994 The Tribunal could not refuse a rectification application on the ground that it lacked jurisdiction when its inherent powers under Rule 41 of the CEGAT (Procedure) Rules, 1982 enabled it to examine the request on merits. The Court held that an apparent legal error could be corrected, especially where the earlier order was said to be inapplicable to Notification No. 154/90-C.E. dated 1-11-1990. The Tribunal's claimed helplessness was therefore untenable, and the order rejecting rectification could not stand. en-us Fri, 19 Sep 2003 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 26 Jul 2010 12:53:10 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=46994 The Tribunal could not refuse a rectification application on the ground that it lacked jurisdiction when its inherent powers under Rule 41 of the CEGAT (Procedure) Rules, 1982 enabled it to examine the request on merits. The Court held that an apparent legal error could be corrected, especially where the earlier order was said to be inapplicable to Notification No. 154/90-C.E. dated 1-11-1990. The Tribunal's claimed helplessness was therefore untenable, and the order rejecting rectification could not stand. Case-Laws Central Excise Fri, 19 Sep 2003 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=46994