2025 (9) TMI 1291

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... Mishra, Adv. for CBIC. (M: 9560018960) PRATHIBA M. SINGH, J. (ORAL) 1. This hearing has been done through hybrid mode. 2. The present petition has been filed by the Petitioner challenging the impugned order dated 30th January, 2025 passed by the Office of Commissioner of Customs, Indira Gandhi International Airport, New Delhi. 3. The Petitioner, who is a resident of Dubai, had travelled to ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....confiscation of "Rolex Watch Model No. 126610LV valued at Rs. 13,48,500/-" detained vide "DR/INDEL4/07.03.2024/003944 dt. 07.03.2024" under Section 111(d), 111(j), 111(l) & 111(m) of the Customs Act, 1962. iii) I give an option to redeem, the goods confiscated, above, for re-export, on payment of fine of Rs. 1,80,000/- (Rupees One Lakh Eighty Thousand only) being holder of "Resident Identity Ca....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....Customs Act, 1962." 5. As per the above impugned order, the Petitioner was permitted to redeem the detained article by paying a fine of Rs. 1,80,000/- for the purpose of re-export. However, the redemption was to be undertaken by the Petitioner within 120 days of the receipt of the impugned order which have now lapsed. 6. The Court has perused the impugned order. There appears to be some error i....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....for confiscation of the detained goods, I have a considered view that the goods may be allowed to be redeemed for re-export purpose only, to the Pax, being holder an "Resident Identity Card ID No. 784-1984-4594800-7 bearing issuing date 30.11.2024 & Expiry date 29.11.2026 issued by United Arab Emirates", on payment of redemption fine under the provisions of Section 125 of the Customs Act, 1962." ....