<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (9) TMI 1291 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=778802</link>
    <description>HC held that a single Rolex wristwatch does not constitute commercial quantity and may be for personal use. The petitioner was permitted to redeem the detained article by paying the redemption fine by 31 October 2025 in accordance with the impugned order. Warehousing charges applicable from the date of detention are payable by the petitioner. The adjudicating authority was cautioned to avoid such errors in future orders. The petition was disposed of.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 17 Sep 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 23 Sep 2025 08:29:49 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=853820" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (9) TMI 1291 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=778802</link>
      <description>HC held that a single Rolex wristwatch does not constitute commercial quantity and may be for personal use. The petitioner was permitted to redeem the detained article by paying the redemption fine by 31 October 2025 in accordance with the impugned order. Warehousing charges applicable from the date of detention are payable by the petitioner. The adjudicating authority was cautioned to avoid such errors in future orders. The petition was disposed of.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 17 Sep 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=778802</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>