2002 (8) TMI 125

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....d reported in 2001 (134) E.L.T. 596 (S.C.) in support of his submission. 3.This contention sought to be raised has not been raised in the return or counter affidavit filed before this Court as back as in the month of February, 1989. This objection is being raised for the first time during the course of oral submission when this petition is being heard finally. 4.The learned Counsel appearing for the Petitioner, in reply, took us through the contents of the petition as well as show cause notice and the averments made therein. He pointed out from Para 5 of the impugned show cause notice that the alleged adverse material on which reliance was being placed in the show cause notice was collected at Bombay. The alleged adverse material sought t....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ion to the rival submissions, we are unable to accept the preliminary objection raised by the learned Counsel for the Respondents for the first time during the course of oral submissions with respect to the territorial jurisdiction of this Court to adjudicate upon this writ petition. Hence, objection in this behalf is overruled being without any substance. 6.So far as merits of this matter is concerned, the contents of the show cause notice would unequivocally go to show that no allegations of the alleged conspiracy alleged to have been hatched by the Petitioner with Mr. Kanti Lal Parekh, M/s. J.M. Kawadkar & Co., Virendra Kumar Handa and Tejinder Singh are to be found in the show cause notice served on the Petitioner although adverse find....