https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=46732 The court ruled in favor of the Petitioner, setting aside the impugned order. It held jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution of India as part of the cause of action occurred in Bombay. The court found a breach of natural justice due to discrepancies between allegations and findings in the order, as well as failure to provide crucial documents to the Petitioner. Consequently, the court quashed the order, emphasizing the importance of fair procedures and allowing the Petitioner a proper opportunity to respond. en-us Tue, 13 Aug 2002 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 23 Jul 2010 15:25:17 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=46732 The court ruled in favor of the Petitioner, setting aside the impugned order. It held jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution of India as part of the cause of action occurred in Bombay. The court found a breach of natural justice due to discrepancies between allegations and findings in the order, as well as failure to provide crucial documents to the Petitioner. Consequently, the court quashed the order, emphasizing the importance of fair procedures and allowing the Petitioner a proper opportunity to respond. Case-Laws Customs Tue, 13 Aug 2002 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=46732