Just a moment...

⚠✕
❮ Top
☎ Help
AI Drafter ✕

Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.

Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review

The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.

• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required


Step 2 – Draft Generation

Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.

• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review.

Try Now →
☰
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Keyword Search :
AI Tools : New
Ask tax questions in natural language. Powered by AI trained on the TaxTMI legal database. Use AI Tools ➞
Call Us / Help / Feedback✕

Contact Us At :

✉ E-mail: [email protected]

✆ Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS
PrevPreviousNextNext

2025 (7) TMI 1899

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....stice Pranav Trivedi For the Petitioner No.  1 : Mr B S soparkar (6851). For the respondent no. 2 : Mrs Kalpana K Raval (1046). For the Respondent No.  3 : Ms Maithili D Mehta (3206). For the Respondent No.  1 : Notice served. ORAL ORDER PER : HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BHARGAV D. KARIA 1. The controversy arising in these petitions is with regard to non-acceptance o....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....gh Court in case of Niti Trust v. Commissioner of Income-Tax, reported in [1997] 90 Taxman 169 (Gujarat) and in case of Commissioner of Income-Tax v. Deepak Family Trust No. 1, reported in [1995] 211 ITR 575 as well Circular No. 6/12 dated 3.8.2012 issued by the CBDT. 3. In view of the above contradictory circulars appears to have been in existence, we direct the petitioner to join 'C....

PrevPreviousNextNext