<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (7) TMI 1899 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=463896</link>
    <description>A private discretionary trust&#039;s ability to file return of income in Form ITR-2 from Assessment Year 2021-22 onwards, instead of Form ITR-5, was in dispute because the return was not accepted in the former form. The HC took note of the controversy and issued notice to the Central Board of Direct Taxes as an added respondent to assist on the filing-form question.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 08 Jul 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Sep 2025 15:28:03 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=851999" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (7) TMI 1899 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=463896</link>
      <description>A private discretionary trust&#039;s ability to file return of income in Form ITR-2 from Assessment Year 2021-22 onwards, instead of Form ITR-5, was in dispute because the return was not accepted in the former form. The HC took note of the controversy and issued notice to the Central Board of Direct Taxes as an added respondent to assist on the filing-form question.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 08 Jul 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=463896</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>