2024 (8) TMI 1630
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
..... Puneet Yadav, Adv. Mr. Sourabh Gupta, Adv. Mr. P. Pratap, Adv. Mr. Prashanth R. Dahat, Adv. Mr. Akshansh Gupta, Adv. Ms. Priya Mittal, Adv. Mr. Vasu Dev, Adv. Mr. T. R. B. Sivakumar, AOR For the Respondent(s) Mr. S Niranjan Reddy, Sr. Adv. Mr. Raavi Yogesh Venkata, AOR Ms. Twinkle Rathi, Adv. Mr. Kotte Venkata Pawan Kumar, Adv. Ms. Thithiksha Padmam, Adv. Mr. Saaketh, Adv. Ms. Prachi Mishra, ....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....o simultaneous remedies and the fact that a Writ Petition had been filed was not mentioned before the NCLAT at the very threshold of the oral submissions. 5. We have heard Mr Shyam Divan, senior counsel appearing on behalf of the appellant and Mr S Niranjan Reddy, senior counsel appearing on behalf of the respondents. 6. It is not in dispute that the appellant had disclosed in the Memo of Ap....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....ppellant on the ground that a writ petition had been filed in addition to the statutory appeal when, as a matter of fact, the writ petition has now been withdrawn from the High Court. The Writ Petition was not maintainable in view of the statutory alternate remedy of an appeal against the order of admission under Section 9 before the NCLAT. 10. In this view of the matter, we allow the appeal an....




TaxTMI
TaxTMI