2024 (8) TMI 1630

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....t(s) Mr. Shyam Divan, Sr. Adv. Mr. Puneet Yadav, Adv. Mr. Sourabh Gupta, Adv. Mr. P. Pratap, Adv. Mr. Prashanth R. Dahat, Adv. Mr. Akshansh Gupta, Adv. Ms. Priya Mittal, Adv. Mr. Vasu Dev, Adv. Mr. T. R. B. Sivakumar, AOR For the Respondent(s) Mr. S Niranjan Reddy, Sr. Adv. Mr. Raavi Yogesh Venkata, AOR Ms. Twinkle Rathi, Adv. Mr. Kotte Venkata Pawan Kumar, Adv. Ms. Thithiksha Padmam, Adv. Mr. ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... permitted to take recourse to two simultaneous remedies and the fact that a Writ Petition had been filed was not mentioned before the NCLAT at the very threshold of the oral submissions. 5. We have heard Mr Shyam Divan, senior counsel appearing on behalf of the appellant and Mr S Niranjan Reddy, senior counsel appearing on behalf of the respondents. 6. It is not in dispute that the appellan....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....be unduly harsh to penalise the appellant on the ground that a writ petition had been filed in addition to the statutory appeal when, as a matter of fact, the writ petition has now been withdrawn from the High Court. The Writ Petition was not maintainable in view of the statutory alternate remedy of an appeal against the order of admission under Section 9 before the NCLAT. 10. In this view of t....