<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (8) TMI 1630 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=463803</link>
    <description>Concurrent pursuit of a writ petition and a statutory appeal was treated as impermissible, but dismissal of the appeal solely on that ground was found unduly harsh where the writ petition had later been withdrawn and the challenge to the NCLT order lay by statutory appeal under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code. The appeal was allowed, the NCLAT&#039;s order was set aside, and the statutory appeal was restored for fresh disposal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 20 Aug 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Sep 2025 08:32:42 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=851018" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (8) TMI 1630 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=463803</link>
      <description>Concurrent pursuit of a writ petition and a statutory appeal was treated as impermissible, but dismissal of the appeal solely on that ground was found unduly harsh where the writ petition had later been withdrawn and the challenge to the NCLT order lay by statutory appeal under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code. The appeal was allowed, the NCLAT&#039;s order was set aside, and the statutory appeal was restored for fresh disposal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>IBC</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 20 Aug 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=463803</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>