Loading...

⚠ โœ•
❮ Top
☎ Help
Draft upto 3 replies to a
tax notice โ€” FREE ๐ŸŽ‰ โœ•

150 credits ยท 30 days

โ€ข Basic Search โ†’ 1 Credit
โ€ข Advanced Search โ†’ 3 Credits
โ€ข Drafter โ†’ 20 to extract + 25 per issue
(โ‰ˆ upto 2-3 drafts on us)

Already used our earlier 20-Credit Demo?
You are still eligible for this new 150-Credit Demo.

Activate your FREE Demo โ†’
☰
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedbackโœ•

Contact Us At :

✉ E-mail: [email protected]

✆ Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters 0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

2002 (2) TMI 120

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ilal B. Naik, J.]. - The petitioner is the A.P. Paper Mills Limited, Rajahmundry, represented by its Deputy Manager (Excise), who assails the order dated 10-12-2001 made by the 1st respondent in Stay Petition No. 67/2001 (V)-C.E., on various grounds. 2.We have heard Sri V. Srinivas, Counsel for the petitioner and Sri C.V. Ramulu, Standing Counsel for the respondents. 3.It is submitted by the....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ng aside the order impugned therein and directed the 1st respondent herein to pass appropriate orders on the basis of the 1st submissions made by the petitioner. Thus the Appellate Authority passed a detailed order on 10-12-2001 in the Stay Petition No. 67/2001 (V)-C.E. 5.The Counsel for the petitioner further submitted that even on remand of the matter, the Appellate Authority has not applied ....